www.earthfiles.de

[Castrol]

George W. Bush hat sich neue Vollmachten genehmigt. Maßgeschneidert für eine "große Katastrophe" oder einen neuen "Angriff" hat er eine Direktive verabschiedet, mit der er sich neben der Exekutive auch Legislative und Judikative unter den Nagel reißt - womit wohl sämtliche Formalien einer Diktatur erfüllt wären. Jetzt brauchts nur noch ein neues 9/11...

hier bitte weiterlesen

__________________

Der Kluge gibt nach.....und weil die Klugen immer nachgeben...regieren die Dummen die Welt....

[Google]

[Castrol]

USA: Heimatschutzministerium bekommt Kontrolle über Arbeitsplatzvergabe

Nachdem Präsident Bush nun sichergestellt hat dass er im Falle eines wie auch immer gearteten “Ereignisses” in den USA der alleinige Herrscher über alle drei staatliche Gewalten werden wird (wobei er die Legislative noch nie beachtet hat), kommt hier die nächste bedenkliche Entwicklung aus den USA...

hier bitte weiterlesen

__________________

Der Kluge gibt nach.....und weil die Klugen immer nachgeben...regieren die Dummen die Welt....

[Castrol]

Im Falle eines katastrophalen Notfalls wird Bush Diktator
Lee Rogers - Die Administration Bush hat eine Direktive mit der Bezeichnung „Direktive des Präsidenten zur Nationalen Sicherheit und zum Schutz des Heimatlandes“ (National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive) erlassen. Die Direktive erging am 9. Mai und fand weder in den etablierten noch in den alternativen Medien nennenswerte Beachtung. Dies ist verständlich angesichts der aufregenden Nachrichten um Ron Paul und die Einwanderungsfrage (der US Kongreßabgeordnete propagiert eine Beschränkung der Einwanderung in die USA, A.d.Ü.), aber diese Nachricht ist ebenso wichtig. In dieser Direktive erklärt George Bush, daß der Präsident im Falle eines „katastrophalen Notfalles“ damit beauftragt ist, die Aktivitäten für den Fortbestand einer verfassungsmäßigen Regierung zu leiten. Die Formulierungen dieser Direktive machen den Präsidenten im Falle einer solchen Katastrophe de facto zum Diktator.

Die Direktive definiert einen „katastrophalen Notfall“ folgendermaßen:

„Katastrophaler Notfall“ bezeichnet jedes Ereignis, das massenhafte Verluste an Menschenleben, Sachschäden oder Zerstörung verursacht, die Bevölkerung, Infrastruktur, Umwelt, Wirtschaft oder die Funktionen der Regierung der USA schwerwiegend beeinträchtigt, unabhängig davon, wo ein solches Ereignis eintritt.

Was bedeutet dies?

hier bitte weiterlesen:

http://oraclesyndicate.twoday.net/stories/3815370/

[Castrol]

Amerikanischer Ex-Vizefinanzminister: Bush plant Ausnahmezustand in USA

Laut dem ehemaligen US-Vizefinanzminister Paul Roberts hat Präsident George Bush eine juristische Grundlage für den Ausnahmezustand im Lande vorbereitet.

Schon in einem Jahr könne sich die USA in eine "Polizeistaat-Diktatur" ("dictatorial police state") verwandeln, die sich im Kriegszustand mit Iran befinden würde.

In dem Fall wären nur die amerikanischen Militärs in der Lage, das zu verhindern. "Sie haben wahrscheinlich die Nase voll und könnten ihm den Gehorsam verweigern", sagte Roberts in einem Funkinterview, das gleichzeitig über mehr als 50 Sender in den USA verbreitet wurde...

hier bitte weiterlesen:

http://de.rian.ru/world/20070720/69327781.html

[matrix555]

Damit fallen alle Anti-Kriegsproteste unter dieses neue Gesetz. Kriegsgegner werden demnach wie Terorristen behandelt und können ohne Anklage, ohne Anwalt und ohne zeitlich Beschränkung inhaftiert werden. !!!!!!!!!

Wer mit der Thematik vertraut ist, weiß dass die FEMA Internierungscamps in ganz Amerika aufrechterhält, die Millionen von Amerikaner inhaftieren können. Im Falle eines weiteren Krieges, der fast schon vor der Tür steht, Iran, wird diese Order natürlich auch darauf ausgeweitet. Die Internierungscamps kann man sich getrost, wie die Konzentrationslager im 3. Reich vorstellen, inclusive Krematorien.

Dazu passt auch die weitere Meldung auf prisonplanet:
Congressman Denied Access To Federal Post-Terror Attack Plans
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/200707_b_denied.htm



Bush Outlaws War Protest -
Citizens Face Full Asset Seizure

In one of his most chilling moves to date against his own citizens, the American War Leader has issued a sweeping order this week outlawing all forms of protest against the Iraq war.

President Bush enacted into US law an 'Executive Order' on July 17th titled "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq", and which says:

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004."

According to Russian legal experts, the greatest concern to the American people are the underlying provisions of this new law, and which, they state, are written 'so broadly' as to outlaw all forms of protest against the war. These provisions state:

"(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

(c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken."

To the subsection of this new US law, according to these legal experts, that says "...the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit...", the insertion of the word 'services' has broad, and catastrophic, consequences for the American people in that any act deemed by their government to be against the Iraqi war is, in fact, supporting the 'enemy' and therefore threatens the 'stabilization of Iraq'.

In an even greater affront to the American people are the provisions of a law called The Patriot Act, and that should they run afoul of this new law they are forbidden to allow anyone to know about it, and as we can read as reported by the Seattle Times News Service:

"The [Patriot] act also expands the use of National Security Letters, which are a kind of warrant that the Justice Department writes for itself, authorizing its agents to seize such things as records of money movements, telephone calls and Internet visits. Recipients of a National Security Letter are not allowed to tell anyone about them, and so cannot contest them."

It is interesting to note, too, that this is not the first time that the United States has unleashed the brutal power of their government against its citizens to further their war aims and stifle domestic dissent, as during the European conflict of World War I they enacted a law called The Sedition Act of 1918 and which "...forbade Americans to use "disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language" about the United States government, flag, or armed forces during war."

It is curious to note that after the enactment of this new law there has been no protest by any of the other political leaders in the United States, with the exception of the only Muslim member of the United States Congress, Minnesota Democrat Keith Ellison, and who compared President Bush to the Nazi War Leader Adolph Hitler by stating the attacks upon the World Trade Center could be likened to the burning of the Reichstag.

Today, as the United States faces an imminent economic collapse, while at the same time its war bill has reached the staggering amount of $648 billion, one of the last freedoms the American people have had to protest their leaders actions against them, and other peoples in the World, has now been taken away from them, the freedom to speak and write in opposition to what is being done to them.

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.", said the great British writer George Orwell, but, and sadly, liberty has been lost to the once free people of the United States who are no longer allowed to tell their leaders, or each other, what they don't want to hear.

With this being so, the American people should, likewise, contemplate their 'new' future, and as, also, stated best by George Orwell, "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever."

© July 19, 2007 EU and US all rights reserved.

[Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.]
_________________
matrix555 boards

[Castrol]